航空承运人拒载权研究.doc

PAGE 作者：张金 新疆财经大学 摘要 航空公司拒载旅客现象在我国民航业中并不鲜见，由此而引发的诉讼案件也日益增多。其中，范后军诉厦门航空公司（以下简称厦航）拒载侵权案在社会上引起了轩然大波和广泛关注，被称为我国首例“航空黑名单” “航空黑名单”：航空公司制定的记录有旅客不良信息的名单。案件。由于我国尚无关于航空承运人拒载权的法律规范，航空公司和旅客之间由拒载而引起的纠纷无法通过司法途径得到根本解决。因此，明确航空承运人是否享有拒载权，无疑将会更好的保护航空公司和旅客的合法权益，也将使得我国航空立法更加完善。本文结合厦航拒载范后军的具体案例，分析探讨航空承运人拒载权存在的合理性，提出加强航空承运人拒载 “航空黑名单”：航空公司制定的记录有旅客不良信息的名单。 　引言通过对厦航拒载范后军事件的叙述提出了目前社会上存在航空公司通过制定“黑名单”拒载“潜在威胁”人员的现象。航空承运人拒载立法的缺失引发了公众的争议，也给我国的司法实践提出了问题。第一章“航空承运人拒载权相关概述”对航空承运人拒载权的概念、法律性质、以及航空承运人拒载权的法律地位做出了详细的解释。第二章“航空承运人拒载权存在的必要性和理论依据”从实践和理论两方面对航空承运人拒载权存在的可能性进行了分析，认为航空承运人可以享有对旅客的拒载权，但是要加以限制。第三章“关于加强我国航空承运人拒载权立法的思考”借鉴美国、加拿大航空承运人拒载权立法经验，从立法和制度建设两方面提出了加强我国航空承运人拒载权立法的一些构想和具体措施。 关键词：航空承运人；拒载权；“黑名单” 　 Abstract Rejection phenomenon airline passengers are not uncommon in the aviation industry in China, which triggered lawsuits are increasing. Among them, the Fan Hou Jun v. Xiamen Airlines rejection infringement case caused an uproar in the community and the widespread concern, known as China's first "black air" case "Airlines black list ": airline passengers to develop the record has a list of bad information.. As our country there is no rejection on the air carrier the right to legal norms, between airlines and passengers caused by the rejection of disputes can not be effectively resolved through legal channels. Therefore, a clear rejection of air carriers are entitled to the right will no doubt "Airlines black list ": airline passengers to develop the record has a list of bad information. 　In this paper, rejection Fan Hou Jun Xiamen Airlines specific cases to analyze the existence of air carriers the right to reasonable rejection, standardize and improve the air carrier made ??the right recommendation rejection. This article is divided into introduction, first chapter, Chapter II, Chapter four parts.The first chapter, "Overview of air carriers that related to rejection," rejection of the concept of the right of air carriers, legal nature, as well as air carriers to make the legal status of the ri