WTO环境下我国行政诉讼受案范围的研究.pdf

WTO环境下我国行政诉讼受案范围的研究 韦群林(法学硕士论文） ABSTRACT Thestudyofreviewableadministrativeactions,orthescopeofjudicialreview of administrativeactionsofthePeople’sRepublic ofChina,haslongtimebeen thedisputesanddebatesofscholarsaswellaslawpractitionersof administrativelitigationlaw.WithChina’sconstitutionaladoptionofthe essentialstatepolicyof “ruleoflaw” in 1999andheraccessiontoWTO(World Trade Organization)in2001,thestudyof thistopichasbecomeamoreheatedone andenlargementofthescopeofjudicial reviewofadministrativeactionsseems to be urgentlynecessaryandunavoidable inChina. Beginningwiththeoriginalmeaningtheconcept “reviewable administrative actions”, or “thescopeofjudicial reviewofadministrativeactions”, the authorofthispaperhasfirstdiscussed theessentialvalueandfunctionof administrativelitigation,historicaldevelopmentofthescopeofjudicialreview of administrativeactionsinChina;then hehasbrieflymadeacomparativestudy of thetopicwithreferencetoitsequivalentsinotherstates,whichshowsthat thenon-reviewable administrativeactionsinChina ,suchas “abstract administrativeactions”, “final administrativeactions” andeven “inner administrativeactions” canwellbereviewedsincejudicialsupervisionand reviewfor administrativeactionsisonly thenaturalconclusionofthe conception of “state ruledoflaw”, andthusthedetailed listingof “reviewable administrativeactions” seems tobeonlyunnecessaryand misleading;andlastbutnotleast,theauthormadeadetailedstudyofthe stipulationsinWTORulesconcerningjudicialreview,whichrequirethat “abstractadministrativeactions”, “final administrativeactions” ,etc., shall fall inthejurisdictionofjudicial review. So theimprovementandenlargementofthe scopeofjudicialreviewof administrativeactionsinChinaisbothunavoidableandclear:tomakeamendments to theadministrative litigationlawtoreview “abstractadministrative actions”, “final administrativeactions” and “inner administrative actions”;to deletedetailedlistingof “reviewable administrativeac